[PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: ti: icssm-prueth: Adds switchdev support for icssm_prueth driver

[Parvathi Pudi]

Hi,

>> +static struct prueth_fw_offsets fw_offsets_v2_1;
>> +
>> +static void icssm_prueth_set_fw_offsets(struct prueth *prueth)
>> +{
>> +	/* Set VLAN/Multicast filter control and table offsets */
>> +	if (PRUETH_IS_EMAC(prueth)) {
>> +		prueth->fw_offsets->mc_ctrl_byte  =
>> +			ICSS_EMAC_FW_MULTICAST_FILTER_CTRL_OFFSET;
>> +		prueth->fw_offsets->mc_filter_mask =
>> +			ICSS_EMAC_FW_MULTICAST_FILTER_MASK_OFFSET;
>> +		prueth->fw_offsets->mc_filter_tbl =
>> +			ICSS_EMAC_FW_MULTICAST_FILTER_TABLE;
> 
> I know for some of these SoCs, there can be multiple instances of the
> hardware blocks. It looks like that will go wrong here, because there
> is only one fw_offsets_v2_1 ?
> 
> Humm, actually, if this are constant, why have fw_offsets_v2_1? Just
> use ICSS_EMAC_FW_MULTICAST_FILTER_CTRL_OFFSET directly?
> 

Sure we will evaluate this and address in the next version.

>> +static void icssm_emac_mc_filter_ctrl(struct prueth_emac *emac, bool enable)
>> +{
>> +	struct prueth *prueth = emac->prueth;
>> +	void __iomem *mc_filter_ctrl;
>> +	void __iomem *ram;
>> +	u32 mc_ctrl_byte;
>> +	u32 reg;
>> +
>> +	ram = prueth->mem[emac->dram].va;
>> +	mc_ctrl_byte = prueth->fw_offsets->mc_ctrl_byte;
>> +	mc_filter_ctrl = ram + mc_ctrl_byte;
> 
> mc_filter_ctrl = ram + ICSS_EMAC_FW_MULTICAST_FILTER_CTRL_OFFSET; ???
> 

Sure we will evaluate this and address in the next version.

>> +static void icssm_prueth_sw_fdb_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +	struct icssm_prueth_sw_fdb_work *fdb_work =
>> +		container_of(work, struct icssm_prueth_sw_fdb_work, work);
>> +	struct prueth_emac *emac = fdb_work->emac;
>> +
>> +	rtnl_lock();
>> +
>> +	/* Interface is not up */
>> +	if (!emac->prueth->fdb_tbl) {
>> +		rtnl_unlock();
>> +		goto free;
>> +	}
> 
> I would probably put the rtnl_unlock() after free: label.
> 

We will address this in the next version.

Thanks and Regards,
Parvathi.