[PATCH net-next] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the phy_power_on()
Chaoyi Chen
chaoyi.chen at rock-chips.com
Tue Oct 14 23:17:29 PDT 2025
On 10/15/2025 12:08 PM, Lizhe wrote:
> 'phy_power_on' is a local scope one within the driver, since the return
> value of the phy_power_on() function is always 0, checking its return
> value is redundant.
>
> the function name 'phy_power_on()' conflicts with the existing
> phy_power_on() function in the PHY subsystem. a suitable alternative
> name would be rk_phy_power_set(), particularly since when the second
> argument is false, this function actually powers off the PHY
>
> Signed-off-by: Lizhe <sensor1010 at 163.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 17 ++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> index 51ea0caf16c1..9d296bfab013 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> @@ -1461,23 +1461,18 @@ static int gmac_clk_enable(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> +static void rk_phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> {
> struct regulator *ldo = bsp_priv->regulator;
> struct device *dev = bsp_priv->dev;
> - int ret;
>
> if (enable) {
> - ret = regulator_enable(ldo);
> - if (ret)
> + if (regulator_enable(ldo))
> dev_err(dev, "fail to enable phy-supply\n");
> } else {
> - ret = regulator_disable(ldo);
> - if (ret)
> + if (regulator_disable(ldo))
> dev_err(dev, "fail to disable phy-supply\n");
> }
> -
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static struct rk_priv_data *rk_gmac_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
> @@ -1655,11 +1650,7 @@ static int rk_gmac_powerup(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv)
> dev_err(dev, "NO interface defined!\n");
> }
>
> - ret = phy_power_on(bsp_priv, true);
> - if (ret) {
> - gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, false);
Is gmac_clk_enable() also redundant?
> - return ret;
> - }
> + rk_phy_power_on(bsp_priv, true);
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>
--
Best,
Chaoyi
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list