[PATCH 00/39] Add i.MX95 DPU/DSI/LVDS support

[Marek Vasut]

On 10/14/25 10:51 AM, Liu Ying wrote:
> Hi Marek,

Hi,

> On 10/11/2025, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> This large series adds support for the i.MX95 display pipeline, including
>> DPU, DSI and LVDS support. Most of the components extend existin drivers,
>> DPU is added into DC driver, DSI into iMX93 DSI driver, LVDS into iMX8MP
>> LDB. Pixel link and pixel interleaver drivers are reworked to work as two
>> independent channels, since there seems to be no dependency between their
>> two channels. The i.MX95 DTSI changes are also included.
>>
>> Since the DPU chapter is missing from the i.MX95 RM, this is based on the
>> NXP downstream kernel fork code and there might be issues.
>>
>> Majority of this series are DPU patches on top of the DC driver, I tried
>> to keep them separate and easy to review. Later part adds LVDS and DSI
>> support, this can be split into separate series.
> 
> Like you said that this patch series is large, please split it.
> Also, make sure proper maintainers are in TO or CC lists for each patch(b4
> tool should do that automatically for you), e.g., patch 37 should be sent
> to Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> according to MAINTAINERS.

I had to trim down the CC list for this series, it was enormous.

I wanted to put this whole thing on the list first, before I start 
splitting it up.

For starters, I think I can send these separately:

- drm/imx: dc: Use bulk clock
- drm/imx: dc: Rework dc_subdev_get_id() to drop ARRAY_SIZE() use
- drm/imx: dc: Rename i.MX8QXP specific Link IDs
- drm/imx: Add more RGB swizzling options
- dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: fsl,irqsteer: Add i.MX95 support

Then in second round, probably all these clean ups:

- drm/imx: dc: *: Pass struct dc_*_subdev_match_data via OF match data

And then rest afterward.

What do you think ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut