[PATCH v7 12/20] soc: mediatek: Add programming flow for unsupported subsys ID hardware
Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)
Jason-JH.Lin at mediatek.com
Mon Oct 13 02:22:42 PDT 2025
On Thu, 2025-10-09 at 13:41 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>
>
> Il 27/08/25 13:37, Jason-JH Lin ha scritto:
> > To support hardware without subsys IDs on new SoCs, add a
> > programming
> > flow that checks whether the subsys ID is valid.
> >
> > If the subsys ID is valid, the flow will call
> > cmdq_pkt_write_subsys()
> > and cmdq_pkt_write_mask_subsys() instead of the original
> > cmdq_pkt_write() and cmdq_pkt_write_mask().
> >
> > If the subsys ID is invalid, the flow will call cmdq_pkt_write_pa()
> > and
> > cmdq_pkt_write_mask_pa() to achieve the same functionality.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > index bb4639ca0b8c..0c324846e334 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> > @@ -167,9 +167,15 @@ static void mtk_mmsys_update_bits(struct
> > mtk_mmsys *mmsys, u32 offset, u32 mask,
> > u32 tmp;
> >
> > if (mmsys->cmdq_base.size && cmdq_pkt) {
> > - ret = cmdq_pkt_write_mask(cmdq_pkt, mmsys-
> > >cmdq_base.subsys,
> > - mmsys->cmdq_base.offset +
> > offset, val,
> > - mask);
> > + offset += mmsys->cmdq_base.offset;
> > + if (mmsys->cmdq_base.subsys != CMDQ_SUBSYS_INVALID)
> > + ret = cmdq_pkt_write_mask_subsys(cmdq_pkt,
> > mmsys->cmdq_base.subsys,
> > + mmsys-
> > >cmdq_base.pa_base, offset,
> > + val, mask);
> > + else /* only MMIO access, no need to check
> > mminfro_offset */
>
> nit: fix typo -> mminfra_offset
>
Thanks! I'll fix this.
> and also it would be nice if you could also say in a comment that all
> GCEs support
> write_mask_pa() without subsys, but it is less performant - so for
> the platforms
> that do support it, we prefer using it.
>
> Of course that has to be properly reworded, but that's the idea
> anyway :-)
>
OK, I'll add more comment for this and other client drivers.
/*
* Only MMIO access, no need to check mminfra_offset.
*
* All GCEs support writing register PA with mask without subsys,
* but this requires extra GCE instructions to convert the PA into
* a format that GCE can handle, which is less performance than
* directly using subsys. Therefore, when subsys is available,
* we prefer to use subsys for writing register PA.
*/
Regards,
Jason-JH Lin
> after which
>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list