[PATCH v12 10/12] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to probe for NUMA support, and multi-node systems
Sean Christopherson
seanjc at google.com
Tue Oct 7 15:14:18 PDT 2025
From: Shivank Garg <shivankg at amd.com>
Add NUMA helpers to probe for support/availability and to check if the
test is running on a multi-node system. The APIs will be used to verify
guest_memfd NUMA support.
Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg at amd.com>
[sean: land helpers in numaif.h, add comments, tweak names]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc at google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
index 1554003c40a1..29572a6d789c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
#ifndef SELFTEST_KVM_NUMAIF_H
#define SELFTEST_KVM_NUMAIF_H
+#include <dirent.h>
+
#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
#include "kvm_syscalls.h"
@@ -28,4 +30,54 @@ KVM_SYSCALL_DEFINE(mbind, 6, void *, addr, unsigned long, size, int, mode,
const unsigned long *, nodemask, unsigned long, maxnode,
unsigned int, flags);
+static inline int get_max_numa_node(void)
+{
+ struct dirent *de;
+ int max_node = 0;
+ DIR *d;
+
+ /*
+ * Assume there's a single node if the kernel doesn't support NUMA,
+ * or if no nodes are found.
+ */
+ d = opendir("/sys/devices/system/node");
+ if (!d)
+ return 0;
+
+ while ((de = readdir(d)) != NULL) {
+ int node_id;
+ char *endptr;
+
+ if (strncmp(de->d_name, "node", 4) != 0)
+ continue;
+
+ node_id = strtol(de->d_name + 4, &endptr, 10);
+ if (*endptr != '\0')
+ continue;
+
+ if (node_id > max_node)
+ max_node = node_id;
+ }
+ closedir(d);
+
+ return max_node;
+}
+
+static bool is_numa_available(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * Probe for NUMA by doing a dummy get_mempolicy(). If the syscall
+ * fails with ENOSYS, then the kernel was built without NUMA support.
+ * if the syscall fails with EPERM, then the process/user lacks the
+ * necessary capabilities (CAP_SYS_NICE).
+ */
+ return !get_mempolicy(NULL, NULL, 0, NULL, 0) ||
+ (errno != ENOSYS && errno != EPERM);
+}
+
+static inline bool is_multi_numa_node_system(void)
+{
+ return is_numa_available() && get_max_numa_node() >= 1;
+}
+
#endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_NUMAIF_H */
--
2.51.0.710.ga91ca5db03-goog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list