[PATCH v2 11/29] arm_mpam: Probe hardware to find the supported partid/pmg values

[Fenghua Yu]

Hi, James,

On 9/10/25 13:42, James Morse wrote:
> CPUs can generate traffic with a range of PARTID and PMG values,
> but each MSC may also have its own maximum size for these fields.
> Before MPAM can be used, the driver needs to probe each RIS on
> each MSC, to find the system-wide smallest value that can be used.
> The limits from requestors (e.g. CPUs) also need taking into account.
>
> While doing this, RIS entries that firmware didn't describe are created
> under MPAM_CLASS_UNKNOWN.
>
> While we're here, implement the mpam_register_requestor() call
> for the arch code to register the CPU limits. Future callers of this
> will tell us about the SMMU and ITS.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
[SNIP]
> @@ -113,6 +123,72 @@ static inline u32 _mpam_read_partsel_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg)
>   
>   #define mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, reg)        _mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MPAMF_##reg)
>   
> +static void __mpam_write_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 val)
> +{
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(reg + sizeof(u32) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);

if reg + 4 == msc->mapped_hwpage_sz, the register is out of boundary as 
well.

So the validation should be:

WARN_ON_ONCE(reg + sizeof(u32) >= msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);

[SNIP]

Thanks.

-Fenghua