[PATCH v5 27/27] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Enable nesting
Jason Gunthorpe
jgg at ziepe.ca
Fri Nov 28 09:12:52 PST 2025
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 06:48:14PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> @@ -441,8 +490,32 @@ static void smmu_reshadow_ste(struct hyp_arm_smmu_v3_device *smmu, u32 sid, bool
> hyp_ste_ptr = smmu_get_ste_ptr(smmu, sid, hyp_ste_base);
> }
>
> - smmu_copy_from_host(smmu, hyp_ste_ptr->data, host_ste_ptr->data,
> + smmu_copy_from_host(smmu, target.data, host_ste_ptr->data,
> STRTAB_STE_DWORDS << 3);
> + /*
> + * Typically, STE update is done as the following
> + * 1- Write last 7 dwords, while STE is invalid
> + * 2- CFGI
> + * 3- Write first dword, making STE valid
> + * 4- CFGI
> + * As the SMMU MUST at least load 64 bits atomically
> + * that gurantees that there is no race between writing
> + * the STE and the CFGI where the SMMU observes parts
> + * of the STE.
> + * In the shadow we update the STE to enable nested translation,
> + * which requires updating first 4 dwords.
> + * That is only done if the STE is valid and not in abort.
> + * Which means it happens at step 4)
> + * So we need to also write the last 7 dwords and send CFGI
> + * before writing the first dword.
> + * There is no need for last CFGI as it's done next.
> + */
This really should share the main driver logic to do STE writes in the
right order and try to avoid making it non-valid if not necessary.
This will not properly support all the real-world kernel flows around
PASID with such a simplistic implementation.
Json
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list