[PATCH] arm64: Remove unreachable break after die

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 27/11/25 2:50 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 12:26:20AM +0200, Osama Abdelkader wrote:
>> die() never returns, the break is unreachable in arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> 
> Is the break causing some problem, e.g. a compiler warning?
> 
> If not, then I don't see a reason to remove the break.
> 
> There are many other instances of "die(...); break" throughout the
> kernel, and this doesn't seem to be speecial.

Agree with Mark. From switch case semantics perspective a break is expected
here regardless what happens to control flow.

> 
> Mark.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 1 -
>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
>> index 681939ef5d16..81dd2d7759eb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
>> @@ -1003,7 +1003,6 @@ int bug_brk_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
>>  	switch (report_bug(regs->pc, regs)) {
>>  	case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_BUG:
>>  		die("Oops - BUG", regs, esr);
>> -		break;
>>  
>>  	case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_WARN:
>>  		break;
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>
>