[PATCH net-next v19 00/15] net: phy: Introduce PHY ports representation
Paolo Abeni
pabeni at redhat.com
Thu Nov 27 04:46:14 PST 2025
On 11/27/25 11:10 AM, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> On 27/11/2025 04:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 13:42:59 +0100 Maxime Chevallier wrote:
>>> This is v19 of the phy_port work. Patches 2 and 3 lack PHY maintainers reviews.
>>>
>>> This v19 has no changes compared to v18, but patch 2 was rebased on top
>>> of the recent 1.6T linkmodes.
>>>
>>> Thanks for everyone's patience and reviews on that work ! Now, the
>>> usual blurb for the series description.
>>
>> Hopefully we can still make v6.19, but we hooked up Claude Code review
>> to patchwork this week, and it points out some legit issues here :(
>> Some look transient but others are definitely legit, please look thru
>> this:
>>
>> https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-review.html?id=5388d317-98c9-458e-8655-d60f31112574
>
> Is there a canonical way to reply to these reviews ? Some are good, some
> aren't.
AFAIK there isn't yet a formalized process for that.
> I'll summarize what I've done in the changelog, but it skips any
> potential discussions that could've been triggered by these reviews. I
> guess this is a matter of letting this process stabilize :)
If you have time it would be great if you could send an email to Chris
Mason (clm at meta.com) detailing the bad parts and why are incorrect.
Thanks,
Paolo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list