[PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385

Horatiu Vultur horatiu.vultur at microchip.com
Thu Nov 27 01:24:50 PST 2025


The 11/26/2025 11:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 

Hi Krzysztof,

> > +
> > +&flx0 {
> > +     atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_TWI>;
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +
> > +     i2c0: i2c at 600 {
> 
> You added a label, so this feels like a new node, but then you miss
> compatible and status feels redundant.

Ah.. OK. I didn't want to add a new node.

> 
> If this is override, you should rather override by labels/phandles in
> the first place. Even when overriding by full node path, you should not
> add custom labels - they belong to the base SoC.

I can remove the label.
So, when I want to override or extend with new properties I should
labels?

> 
> > +             pinctrl-0 = <&fc0_b_pins>;
> > +             pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +             dmas = <0>, <0>;
> > +             i2c-analog-filter;
> > +             i2c-digital-filter;
> > +             i2c-digital-filter-width-ns = <35>;
> > +             i2c-sda-hold-time-ns = <1500>;
> > +             status = "okay";
> 
> > +
> > +             eeprom at 54 {
> > +                     compatible = "atmel,24c01";
> > +                     reg = <0x54>;
> > +                     status = "okay";
> 
> Why? Was it disabled anywhere?

It wasn't disabled anywhere. I will remove this.

> 
> > +             };
> > +
> > +             eeprom at 55 {
> > +                     compatible = "atmel,24c01";
> > +                     reg = <0x55>;
> > +                     status = "okay";
> > +             };
> > +     };
> > +};
> > +
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

-- 
/Horatiu



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list