[PATCH v5 5/9] KVM: arm64: Include VM type when checking VM capabilities in pKVM
Fuad Tabba
tabba at google.com
Wed Nov 26 09:05:47 PST 2025
On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 at 15:36, Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 11:00:47 +0000,
> Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > I agree, but I don't think this patch changes this behavior. Later on
> > in this series we expand the check to apply to non-protected VMs to
> > also restrict features that are not allowed in protected mode in
> > general -- something that until this series we didn't have.
>
> Ah, you are correct. Apologies for being so thick.
>
> Still, I think we need to do something here -- the whole extension
> check without context is just broken.
I agree, but should we handle that in another series, since I don't
think that there's a straightfoward solution for this?
Cheers,
/fiad
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list