[PATCH v2 0/2] set_id_regs cleanup

Oliver Upton oupton at kernel.org
Tue Nov 25 13:28:00 PST 2025


On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 07:45:22PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 18:31:37 +0000,
> Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 03:27:48PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:12:05 +0000,
> > > Ben Horgan <ben.horgan at arm.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > For this v2 I've dropped the ksft_test accounting fix. Mark Brown has
> > > > more extensive changes [1] and looks to be a user of the set_id_regs
> > > > test rather than someone just doing some cleanup. The other change in
> > > > this series is to remove ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS from the tools
> > > > sysreg.h header rather than the kernel version. I'll send a separate
> > > > patch to remove the kernel version.
> > > > 
> > > > Tidies up a few small things in set_id_regs. The removal of
> > > > ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS touches other code only so much as it removes
> > > > the define but set_id_regs.c is the only place its used.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> > 
> > Thanks Marc. Shall I take these through the arm64 tree, together with
> > the removal of the macro? They should have probably been a single
> > series.
> 
> Oliver is in charge of the merge window this time around, so I'll
> defer to him, but that's absolutely fine from my PoV.

Catalin, please go ahead and apply. I don't believe I have anything that
will conflict.

Acked-by: Oliver Upton <oupton at kernel.org>

Thanks,
Oliver



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list