[PATCH v7 RESEND 2/3] thermal: exynos_tmu: Support new hardware and update TMU interface

[Tudor Ambarus]

Hi, Shin Son,

On 11/24/25 1:41 PM, 손신 wrote:
>> Shin, a bit unrelated with the patch, but I wanted to let you know that I
>> started looking at the GS101 TMU. I assume it's very similar with the TMU
>> on exynosautov920. Do you know if they share the same IP version?

I guess you omitted this question.

>>
>> I noticed GS101 uses ACPM calls to communicate with the TMU. Why did you
>> choose to not use ACPM for exynosautov920 TMU?

cut

> Regarding ACPM, I did not introduce it earlier because I was trying to align the implementation with the existing framework.
> However, if we move toward a separate driver, I will reconsider whether ACPM integration makes sense there.
> Would it be possible to get your feedback again when I prepare the next revision of the driver?

Yes, I'll try to review it. Add me to cc please.

> 
> Plus, the GS101 TMU driver isn't upstream yet, right?

It isn't. I started getting familiar with it, and will try to upstream it.
Given exynosautov9 and gs101 already share lots of IPs, I assume TMU is similar.
I will likely follow the ACPM route because that's what the downstream code does.

> Could you share where I can find the example code you mentioned? Thank you in advance.

Are you referring to the GS101 TMU driver code? Here it is:
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/google-modules/raviole-device/+/refs/heads/android-gs-raviole-mainline/drivers/thermal/samsung/gs_tmu_v2.c

DT at:
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/google-modules/raviole-device/+/refs/heads/android-gs-raviole-mainline/arch/arm64/boot/dts/google/gs101.dtsi#1453

Is the downstream exynosautov9 code publicly available? Can you provide some links?

Thanks!
ta