[PATCH v9 4/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS combo phy for ExynosAutov920

Vinod Koul vkoul at kernel.org
Fri Nov 21 02:24:34 PST 2025


On 21-11-25, 13:36, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul at kernel.org>
> > Sent: 20 November 2025 10:07 PM
> > To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar at samsung.com>
> > Cc: kishon at kernel.org; robh at kernel.org; krzk+dt at kernel.org;
> > conor+dt at kernel.org; alim.akhtar at samsung.com; andre.draszik at linaro.org;
> > peter.griffin at linaro.org; kauschluss at disroot.org; johan at kernel.org;
> > ivo.ivanov.ivanov1 at gmail.com; m.szyprowski at samsung.com;
> > s.nawrocki at samsung.com; linux-phy at lists.infradead.org;
> > devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org;
> > rosa.pila at samsung.com; dev.tailor at samsung.com;
> > faraz.ata at samsung.com; muhammed.ali at samsung.com;
> > selvarasu.g at samsung.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS combo phy for
> > ExynosAutov920
> > 
> > On 10-10-25, 12:39, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> > > Support UTMI+ combo phy for this SoC which is somewhat simmilar to
> >                                                         ^^^^^^^^ typo
> > 
> > > what the existing Exynos850 support does. The difference is that some
> > > register offsets and bit fields are defferent from Exynos850.
> >                                            ^^^^^^^^ again
> 
> Thank for the review and sorry for the typo and can you please
> confirm if updated commit message is fine, mentioned as below?
> 
> "
>     phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS combo phy for ExynosAutov920
> 
>     Support UTMI+ combo phy for this SoC, which is somewhat similar to
>     what the existing Exynos850 supports. The difference is that some
>     register offsets and bit fields are different from Exynos850.
> 
>     Add required change in phy driver to support combo HS phy for this SoC.
> "

better :-)
-- 
~Vinod



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list