[PATCH v4 19/49] KVM: arm64: Compute vgic state irrespective of the number of interrupts
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Thu Nov 20 09:25:09 PST 2025
As we are going to rely on the [G]ICH_HCR{,_EL2} register to be
programmed with MI information at all times, slightly de-optimise
the flush/sync code to always be called. This is rather lightweight
when no interrupts are in flight.
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c | 35 ++---------------------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
index 7ee253a9fb77e..39346baa2677c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -985,8 +985,6 @@ static inline void vgic_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* Sync back the hardware VGIC state into our emulation after a guest's run. */
void kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int used_lrs;
-
/* If nesting, emulate the HW effect from L0 to L1 */
if (vgic_state_is_nested(vcpu)) {
vgic_v3_sync_nested(vcpu);
@@ -996,20 +994,10 @@ void kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu))
vgic_v3_nested_update_mi(vcpu);
- /* An empty ap_list_head implies used_lrs == 0 */
- if (list_empty(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_head))
- return;
-
if (can_access_vgic_from_kernel())
vgic_save_state(vcpu);
- if (!static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_vgic_global_state.gicv3_cpuif))
- used_lrs = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.used_lrs;
- else
- used_lrs = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.used_lrs;
-
- if (used_lrs)
- vgic_fold_lr_state(vcpu);
+ vgic_fold_lr_state(vcpu);
vgic_prune_ap_list(vcpu);
}
@@ -1053,29 +1041,10 @@ void kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu))
vgic_v3_nested_update_mi(vcpu);
- /*
- * If there are no virtual interrupts active or pending for this
- * VCPU, then there is no work to do and we can bail out without
- * taking any lock. There is a potential race with someone injecting
- * interrupts to the VCPU, but it is a benign race as the VCPU will
- * either observe the new interrupt before or after doing this check,
- * and introducing additional synchronization mechanism doesn't change
- * this.
- *
- * Note that we still need to go through the whole thing if anything
- * can be directly injected (GICv4).
- */
- if (list_empty(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_head) &&
- !vgic_supports_direct_irqs(vcpu->kvm))
- return;
-
DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
- if (!list_empty(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_head)) {
- raw_spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock);
+ scoped_guard(raw_spinlock, &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock)
vgic_flush_lr_state(vcpu);
- raw_spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.ap_list_lock);
- }
if (can_access_vgic_from_kernel())
vgic_restore_state(vcpu);
--
2.47.3
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list