[PATCH v3 01/15] gpio: dwapb: Use modern PM macros

Jisheng Zhang jszhang at kernel.org
Wed Nov 19 08:04:58 PST 2025


On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 06:11:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 6:09 PM Jisheng Zhang <jszhang at kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 05:42:59PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:43:13PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > > >     struct dwapb_context    *ctx;
> > > > -#endif
> > >
> > > But why this? For the PM_SLEEP=n cases it will give an unrequested overhead.
> >
> > the pm_ptr() and pm_sleep_ptr() can optimize out the PM related
> > functions, but those functions are still compiled, so if we keep the
> > #ifdef, there will be build errors.
> 
> Is this an expectation or you can share the error, please?

drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function ‘dwapb_irq_set_wake’:
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:368:51: error: ‘struct dwapb_gpio_port’ h
as no member named ‘ctx’
  368 |         struct dwapb_context *ctx = gpio->ports[0].ctx;




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list