[PATCH v3 05/15] gpio: pxa: Use modern PM macros
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at intel.com
Wed Nov 19 07:47:41 PST 2025
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:43:17PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Use the modern PM macros for the suspend and resume functions to be
> automatically dropped by the compiler when CONFIG_PM or
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are disabled, without having to use #ifdef guards.
>
> This has the advantage of always compiling these functions in,
> independently of any Kconfig option. Thanks to that, bugs and other
> regressions are subsequently easier to catch.
...
> struct pxa_gpio_bank {
...
> unsigned long irq_mask;
> unsigned long irq_edge_rise;
> unsigned long irq_edge_fall;
> -
As I already pointed out this is stray change. Why you ignored my comment?
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> unsigned long saved_gplr;
> unsigned long saved_gpdr;
> unsigned long saved_grer;
> unsigned long saved_gfer;
> -#endif
Same Q as per dwapb driver. The CONFIG_PM=n doesn't need these.
> };
...
> static struct syscore_ops pxa_gpio_syscore_ops = {
> - .suspend = pxa_gpio_suspend,
> - .resume = pxa_gpio_resume,
> + .suspend = pm_ptr(pxa_gpio_suspend),
> + .resume = pm_ptr(pxa_gpio_resume),
> };
This is not a device PM ops actually. Is there any guarantees on the
relationship with CONFIG_PM and these callbacks? If so, I think we
need to have special macros somewhere in include/linux/syscore_ops.h.
Otherwise I'm not sure this will be a good patch at all.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list