[PATCH v2 11/21] drm/msm/a6xx: Improve MX rail fallback in RPMH vote init

[Akhil P Oommen]

On 11/12/2025 4:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 11/10/25 5:37 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> Current logic assumes that the voltage corners in both MxG and MxA are
>> always same. This is not true for recent targets. So, rework the rpmh init
>> sequence to probe and calculate the votes with the respective rails, ie,
>> GX rails should use MxG as secondary rail and Cx rail should use MxA as
>> the secondary rail.
> 
> Is GMU always on Mx*A* and never Mx*C*?

I believe the GMUs we have so far are always on MxA when it is available.

-Akhil.

> 
> Konrad