[PATCH v5 3/5] docs: staging: gpio-rpmsg: gpio over rpmsg bus
Randy Dunlap
rdunlap at infradead.org
Thu Nov 13 14:34:28 PST 2025
On 11/13/25 2:23 PM, Shenwei Wang wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 3:18 PM
>> To: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta at gmail.com>; Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang at nxp.com>; Bjorn Andersson
>> <andersson at kernel.org>; Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>;
>> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt at kernel.org>; Conor Dooley
>> <conor+dt at kernel.org>; Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>; Sascha Hauer
>> <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet at lwn.net>; Linus Walleij
>> <linus.walleij at linaro.org>; Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl at bgdev.pl>; Pengutronix
>> Kernel Team <kernel at pengutronix.de>; Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com>;
>> Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>; linux-remoteproc at vger.kernel.org;
>> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; imx at lists.linux.dev; linux-arm-
>> kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> doc at vger.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx at nxp.com>
>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] docs: staging: gpio-rpmsg: gpio over rpmsg bus
>> On 11/12/25 5:35 AM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 2:59 PM Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 02:33:13PM -0600, Shenwei Wang wrote:
>>>>> Describes the gpio rpmsg transport protocol over the rpmsg bus
>>>>> between the cores.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang at nxp.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/staging/gpio-rpmsg.rst | 202
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> Documentation/staging/index.rst | 1 +
>>>>
>>>> Why is this in staging when none of the drivers are?
>>>
>>> I guess that's because remoteproc.rst and rpmsg.rst are in
>>> Documentation/staging and that's because when converting them from
>>> .txt to .rst the author didn't know a good place where to move them.
>>>
>>> Would Documentation/driver-api be a good place for these doc files? I
>>> can move them and then Shenwei place the gpio-rpmsg.rst in the
>>> Documentation/driver-api also
>>
>> Documentation/driver-api/gpio/ if its driver documentation.
>> Documentation/userspace-api/gpio/ if it user API docs There is also gpio
>> documentation in Documentation/admin-guide/gpio/ which could also be
>> appropriate depending on the nature of the document.
>>
>
> Thanks Randy!
>
> Do we have a final decision on where to place this document?
> My thought is that Documentation/driver-api/gpio/ seems more appropriate.
> However, it’s worth noting that while this is a driver-related document, it doesn’t describe the driver API itself.
I agree that in driver-api/gpio/ seems to be the best place for it.
(even though it's not my call)
--
~Randy
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list