[PATCH v5 6/6] clk: scmi: Add i.MX95 OEM extension support for SCMI clock driver

[Sebin Francis]

Hi Peng,

On 05/11/25 21:18, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Sebin,
> 
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] clk: scmi: Add i.MX95 OEM extension
>> support for SCMI clock driver
>>
>> Hi Peng,
>>
>> On 09/10/25 09:18, Peng Fan wrote:
>>>    - Introduce 'clk-scmi-oem.c' to support vendor-specific OEM
>> extensions
>>>      for the SCMI clock driver, allows clean integration of vendor-
>> specific
>>>      features without impacting the core SCMI clock driver logic.
>>>    - Extend 'clk-scmi.h' with 'scmi_clk_oem' structure and related
>> declarations.
>>>    - Initialize OEM extensions via 'scmi_clk_oem_init()'.
>>>    - Support querying OEM-specific features and setting spread
>> spectrum.
>>>    - Pass 'scmi_device' to 'scmi_clk_ops_select()' for OEM data access.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
>>
>> Thanks for the patch. I only have a minor comment, otherwise the
>> patch looks good.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +
>>> +int scmi_clk_oem_init(struct scmi_device *sdev) {
>>> +	const struct scmi_handle *handle = sdev->handle;
>>> +	int i, size = ARRAY_SIZE(info);
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
>>> +		if (strcmp(handle->version->vendor_id,
>> SCMI_IMX_VENDOR) ||
>>> +		    strcmp(handle->version->sub_vendor_id,
>> SCMI_IMX_SUBVENDOR))
>>> +			continue;
>>> +		if (info[i].compatible &&
>>> +		    !of_machine_is_compatible(info[i].compatible))
>>> +			continue;
>>> +
>>> +		break;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (i < size)
>>> +		dev_set_drvdata(&sdev->dev, (void *)info[i].data);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> This above logic is tailor made for IMX is it possible to make it generic?
> 
> Yeah. I will update it. It should compare with each entry in
> const struct scmi_clk_oem_info info[] = {
> 	{ SCMI_IMX_VENDOR, SCMI_IMX_SUBVENDOR, NULL, &scmi_clk_oem_imx },
> };
> 
> To TI, I think it could be extended to
> +const struct scmi_clk_oem_info info[] = {
> +	{ SCMI_IMX_VENDOR, SCMI_IMX_SUBVENDOR, NULL, &scmi_clk_oem_imx },
> +	{ SCMI_TI_VENDOR, SCMI_TI_SUBVENDOR, NULL, &scmi_clk_oem_ti },
> +};
> 

Thanks for updating it. Yes, for TI as you mentioned we will add one entry.

Thanks
Sebin.

> Regards
> Peng.
> 
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c index
>>>
>> bf85924d61985eb9e596419349eb883e3817de73..1ed2091e3d4a951
>> c8662db4c94de
>>> e4b9c98b8326 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
>>> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>>>    #include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
>>>    #include <asm/div64.h>
>>>
>>> +#include "clk-scmi.h"
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sebin