[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: imx: move nand related property under nand at 0

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 10/11/2025 17:12, Frank Li wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 04:52:01PM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
>> Hello Frank,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 10:29:05AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 12:55:38PM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 05:27:14PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
>>>>> Add child node nand at 0 and move NAND related property under it to align
>>>>> modern nand-controller.yaml.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix below CHECK_DTBS warnings:
>>>>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-colibri-aster.dtb: nand-controller at 1806000 (fsl,imx6q-gpmi-nand): Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('nand-ecc-mode', 'nand-ecc-step-size', 'nand-ecc-strength', 'nand-on-flash-bbt' were unexpected)
>>>>>         from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/gpmi-nand.yaml#
>>>>>
>>>>> Since 2019 year, commit
>>>>> (212e496935929 dt-bindings: mtd: Add YAML schemas for the generic NAND options)
>>>>> NAND related property is preferred located under nand@<n> even though only
>>>>> one NAND chip supported.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li at nxp.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6-logicpd-som.dtsi           |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-icore.dtsi              |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-phytec-pfla02.dtsi      |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-phytec-phycore-som.dtsi |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-skov-cpu.dtsi           |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-tx6.dtsi                |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-geam.dts                 |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-isiot.dtsi               |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-phytec-phycore-som.dtsi  |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-tx6ul.dtsi               |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-colibri.dtsi            | 12 ++++++++----
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-engicam-microgea.dtsi   | 12 ++++++++----
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-myir-mys-6ulx.dtsi      |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ulz-bsh-smm-m2.dts          |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7-colibri.dtsi               |  8 ++++++--
>>>>>  15 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Was any of these changes tested? Is the driver able to cope with the
>>>> binding change?
>>>
>>> I have not board to do direct test. This format is used at imx8 platform,
>>> which use the same gpmi driver.
>>>
>>> This properties are parsed at mtd common part
>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
>>>
>>> If you have one of above board to test it, it will be appericated.
>>
>> I did a minimal boot test, on colibri-imx6ull, and the board was booting
>> fine, with Linux 6.18.0-rc4 and this patch applied.
>>
>> I am wondering if there is any impact with the bootloader, this DT is
>> used as it is also in U-Boot, and there the NAND driver is for sure
>> different. Any comment on this? I was not able to test this combination.
> 
> Uboot should have theirself tree, which copy dts and not direct use it.

Sorry, but what? No they shall not.

There is only one DTS. For all upstream users following kernel style,
which includes BSD and U-boot and probably many more.


Best regards,
Krzysztof