回复: 回复: [PATCH 2/3] Reset: cix: add support for cix sky1 resets

Gary Yang gary.yang at cixtech.com
Mon Nov 10 03:32:48 PST 2025


Hi krzysztof:

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> 发送时间: 2025年11月10日 19:22
> 收件人: Gary Yang <gary.yang at cixtech.com>; p.zabel at pengutronix.de;
> robh at kernel.org; krzk+dt at kernel.org; conor+dt at kernel.org
> 抄送: devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; cix-kernel-upstream
> <cix-kernel-upstream at cixtech.com>
> 主题: Re: 回复: [PATCH 2/3] Reset: cix: add support for cix sky1 resets
> 
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
> 
> On 10/11/2025 12:18, Gary Yang wrote:
> >>
> >>> +static struct platform_driver sky1_reset_driver = {
> >>> +     .probe  = sky1_reset_probe,
> >>> +     .driver = {
> >>> +             .name           = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> >>> +             .of_match_table = sky1_reset_dt_ids,
> >>> +     },
> >>> +};
> >>> +static int __init reset_sky1_init(void) {
> >>> +     return platform_driver_register(&sky1_reset_driver);
> >>> +}
> >>> +subsys_initcall(reset_sky1_init);
> >>
> >> This should be rather just module_platform_driver. Does not look like
> >> part of subsystem, but looks like regular driver.
> >>
> >
> > Some modules depend reset module. When boot system, these modules
> can't probe before register reset.
> 
> Which modules? You statement is so imprecise that my only answer is:
> sorry, deferred probe is old thing now and everyone should use it.
> 
> > To make these modules probe earlier, we use subsys_initcall() to
> > instead of module_platform_driver(). Do you have better suggestions?
> 
> Look how deferred probe works.
> 

Yes, you're right. But deferred probe needs to take more time on booting.
To make the boot faster, better experiences, we have to use subsys_initcall()

Best wishes
Gary

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list