[PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of ID_PFR1_EL1.GIC
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Sat Nov 8 03:24:44 PST 2025
On Fri, 07 Nov 2025 10:06:23 +0000,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc
>
> On 30/10/2025 12:27, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Peter reported[0] that restoring a GICv2 VM fails badly, and correctly
> > points out that ID_PFR1_EL1.GIC isn't writable, while its 64bit
> > equivalent is. I broke that in 6.12.
> >
> > The other thing is that fixing the ID regs at runtime isn't great.
> > specially when we could adjust them at the point where the GIC gets
> > created.
> >
> > This small series aims at fixing these issues. I've only tagged the
> > first one as a stable candidate.
>
> But, all 3 patches have the same Fixes tag, was that intentional ?
Yes. Fixes don't necessarily need backporting, and the latter ones,
while making things less awful, are not absolutely necessary to fix
6.12.
However, I have no doubt that the Artificial Idiots that automatically
backport stuff to stable will pick whatever seems to apply without any
discrimination.
I've stopped fighting that battle.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list