[PATCH v14 00/18] media: rockchip: add a driver for the rockchip camera interface
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Fri Nov 7 10:54:41 PST 2025
On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 07:41:59PM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
> On 11/7/25 18:32, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 02:51:29PM +0200, Michael Riesch via B4 Relay wrote:
> >> Habidere,
> >>
> >> This series introduces support for the Rockchip Camera Interface (CIF),
> >> which is featured in many Rockchip SoCs in different variations.
> >> For example, the PX30 Video Input Processor (VIP) is able to receive
> >> video data via the Digital Video Port (DVP, a parallel data interface)
> >> and transfer it into system memory using a double-buffering mechanism
> >> called ping-pong mode.
> >> The RK3568 Video Capture (VICAP) unit, on the other hand, features a
> >> DVP and a MIPI CSI-2 receiver that can receive video data independently
> >> (both using the ping-pong scheme).
> >> The different variants may have additional features, such as scaling
> >> and/or cropping.
> >> Finally, the RK3588 VICAP unit constitutes an essential piece of the
> >> camera interface with one DVP, six MIPI CSI-2 receivers, scale/crop
> >> units, and a data path multiplexer (to scaler units, to ISP, ...).
> >
> > I understand both RK3568 and RK3588 include an ISP. Do you have insight on
> > how would this work, should the support for the ISP be added later on?
>
> Short answer: Yes and yes.
>
> Long answer:
>
> The patch series at hand adds support for the PX30 VIP and the RK3568
> VICAP. I cannot really say something about the PX30, but on the RK3568
> VICAP and ISP are orthogonal (the ISP features its own MIPI CSI-2
> receiver, different from that introduced in this series). Thus, ISP
> support can be introduced anytime (whenever someone is motivated ;-)).
Won't they both be connected to the same sensor though, and probably the
same D-PHY in the SoC ? They don't seem entirely separate to me.
A block diagram that shows connections between the CSI-2 pins, D-PHY,
CSI-2 receivers, VICAP and ISP could help.
> Once this patch series is merged, I'll push out changes that introduce
> support for the RK3588 VICAP. We can discuss the integration of any
> RK3588 ISP in this scope then -- and there may be some things to discuss
> as there the VICAP and the ISP(s) are directly connected by means of a
> MUX unit in the VICAP.
>
> Alright?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list