[PATCH 3/4 v3] PCI: s32g: Add initial PCIe support (RC)

[Niklas Cassel]

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 12:43:09PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2025, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 08:50:46AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 at 21:04, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > +     dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_FORCE);
> > > > > +     val |= PORT_FORCE_DO_DESKEW_FOR_SRIS;
> > > > > +     dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_FORCE, val);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     /*
> > > > > +      * Set max payload supported, 256 bytes and
> > > > > +      * relaxed ordering.
> > > > > +      */
> > > > > +     val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL);
> > > > > +     val &= ~(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN |
> > > > > +              PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD |
> > > > > +              PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ);
> > > > > +     val |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN |
> > > > > +            PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD_256B |
> > > > > +            PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ_256B;
> > > > > +     dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, val);
> > > >
> > > > MPS and relaxed ordering should be configured by the PCI core.  Is
> > > > there some s32g-specific restriction about these?
> > > 
> > > I will check with the team why they did that
> > 
> > Most likely, the reason is that, the PCI core does not set the MPS to the
> > maximum supported MPS for the root port.
> 
> PCI core set/doesn't set MPS based on config. Perhaps try with 
> CONFIG_PCIE_BUS_PERFORMANCE.

Sorry, I should have been more clear.

Since a lot of PCIe controller drivers have similar code to the above,
it is obvious that a lot of controller drivers want to increase the MPS
regardless of PCIE_BUS_* bus config value.

With the current PCI code, MPS for root ports will not be touched if
PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF or PCIE_BUS_DEFAULT.

After the above series, MPS for root ports will be set to max supported
also for PCIE_BUS_DEFAULT.


Kind regards,
Niklas