[PATCH v5 6/7] dt-bindings: clock: rockchip: Add RK3506 clock and reset unit

Conor Dooley conor at kernel.org
Tue Nov 4 09:24:45 PST 2025


On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 09:48:56AM +0800, zhangqing wrote:
> 
> 在 2025/10/28 0:47, Conor Dooley 写道:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 04:41:46PM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> > > From: Finley Xiao<finley.xiao at rock-chips.com>
> > > 
> > > Add device tree bindings for clock and reset unit on RK3506 SoC.
> > > Add clock and reset IDs for RK3506 SoC.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao<finley.xiao at rock-chips.com>
> > > ---
> > >   .../bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3506-cru.yaml   |  51 ++++
> > >   .../dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3506-cru.h   | 285 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >   .../dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3506-cru.h   | 211 +++++++++++++
> > >   3 files changed, 547 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3506-cru.yaml
> > >   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3506-cru.h
> > >   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3506-cru.h
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3506-cru.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3506-cru.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..ecb5fa497747
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3506-cru.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id:http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/rockchip,rk3506-cru.yaml#
> > > +$schema:http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Rockchip RK3506 Clock and Reset Unit (CRU)
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Finley Xiao<finley.xiao at rock-chips.com>
> > > +  - Heiko Stuebner<heiko at sntech.de>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > +  The RK3506 CRU generates the clock and also implements reset for SoC
> > > +  peripherals.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    const: rockchip,rk3506-cru
> > > +
> > > +  reg:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +  "#clock-cells":
> > > +    const: 1
> > > +
> > > +  "#reset-cells":
> > > +    const: 1
> > > +
> > > +  clocks:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > Can you explain somewhere why the input clock is not required?
> > Feels like it really should be required, if it is what the output clocks
> > are generated from, but I can also see why it might be optional either.
> > pw-bot: changes-requested
> 
> Our default hardware input clock is 24M.
> 
>  Some Socs and hardware input clocks support 24M、24.576M、26M. For

Other SoCs get other compatibles, so that is not relevant.

> different input frequencies, there is a need to configure clocks.

That seems like it should be required, because there's always one being
provided.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20251104/369e7958/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list