[PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: crypto: fsl,sec-v4.0: Add power domains for iMX8QM and iMX8QXP

[John Ernberg]

Hi Frank,

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:57:46AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 02:43:07PM +0000, John Ernberg wrote:
> > NXP SoCs like the iMX8QM, iMX8QXP or iMX8DXP use power domains for
> > resource management.
> >
> > Allow specifying them for such SoCs.
> 
> suggest comment:
> 
> Add compatible string fsl,imx8qm-caam, and allow power-domains for it. Keep
> the same restriction for others.

Ack.

> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Ernberg <john.ernberg at actia.se>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v3:
> >  - Fix warnings discovered by Rob Herring's bot
> >  - Declare the compatibles correctly (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
> >
> > v2:
> >  - Adjust commit message (Frank Li)
> >  - Only allow power-domains when compatible with imx8qm (Frank Li)
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/crypto/fsl,sec-v4.0.yaml         | 45 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl,sec-v4.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl,sec-v4.0.yaml
> > index 75afa441e019..a4ada0e2d97c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl,sec-v4.0.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl,sec-v4.0.yaml
> > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ properties:
> >        - items:
> >            - enum:
> >                - fsl,imx6ul-caam
> > +              - fsl,imx8qm-caam
> 
> suggest add fsl,imx8qxp-caam, fsl,imx8dxl-caam also

While I know the DXL comes with the CAAM, I don't have access to any boards
with a DXL on it nor the DXL security manual. So I cannot validate any
changes I would make for the DXL variant.

I propose to keep the DXL out of this patch set, is that ok for you?

I'll add a compat for the QXP in V4.

Thanks! // John Ernberg

> 
> Frank