[PATCH v5 2/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62l: add initial infrastructure

[Sascha Hauer]

On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 10:09:20PM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> +	gpio0: gpio at 600000 {
> +		compatible = "ti,am64-gpio", "ti,keystone-gpio";
> +		reg = <0x00 0x00600000 0x00 0x100>;
> +		gpio-controller;
> +		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +		interrupt-parent = <&gic500>;
> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 260 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 261 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 262 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 263 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 264 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 266 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 267 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> +		interrupt-controller;
> +		#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +		power-domains = <&scmi_pds 34>;
> +		clocks = <&scmi_clk 140>;
> +		clock-names = "gpio";
> +		ti,ngpio = <126>;
> +		ti,davinci-gpio-unbanked = <0>;
> +		status = "disabled";
> +	};

The gpio ports are always available and do not have any dependencies.
Can we drop the status = "disabled"; here and for the other gpio nodes?

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |