[PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf, arm64: Support up to 12 function arguments
Alexis Lothoré
alexis.lothore at bootlin.com
Tue May 27 02:13:21 PDT 2025
On Tue May 27, 2025 at 11:09 AM CEST, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> On 5/27/2025 4:45 PM, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> + /* We can not know for sure about exact alignment needs for
>>>> + * struct passed on stack, so deny those
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG)
>>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> leave the error code as is, namely, return -ENOTSUPP?
>> Actually this change follows a complaint from checkpatch:
>>
>> "WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP"
>
> Seems we can just ignore this warning, as ENOTSUPP is already used
> throughout bpf, and the actual value -524 is well recognized.
Ok, then I'll switch it back to ENOTSUPP
--
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list