[PATCH v6 3/8] MAINTAINERS: add maintainer for the Ka-Ro tx8p-ml81 COM module

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/05/2025 22:39, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Dear Device Tree Maintainers,
> Dear Maud and Shawn,
> 
> On 09.05.25 11:03, Maud Spierings | GOcontroll wrote:
>> On 5/9/25 10:58, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>>>>> +KA-RO TX8P COM MODULE
>>>>>> +M:	Maud Spierings <maudspierings at gocontroll.com>
>>>>>> +L:	imx at lists.linux.dev
>>>>>> +S:	Maintained
>>>>>> +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-tx8p-ml81.dtsi
>>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not fond of such changes, as MAINTAINERS file could be bloated
>>>>> quickly by individual DTS.
>>>>
>>>> Is there some way you would prefer to see it? I don't really know of a better
>>>> way.
>>>
>>> There was some discussion about getting ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl pick
>>> up the Author: field (in DTS header area).  But I'm not sure where it
>>> ended.
>>
>> I feel like that would be wrong in this situation too, it would pull in
>> Lothar Wassmann, who has nothing to do with me upstreaming this. I have
>> seen him around on the mailing list but given that Ka-Ro are not
>> upstreaming these themselves, I feel it would be weird to pull him into
>> this.
> 
> We can add multiple authors. Authors not wishing to receive mail can always
> remove their name or blackhole their mail address via the mailmap.
> 
> I am not leaning strongly in favor of either way, but I am bothered a little
> by b4 nagging me about adding MAINTAINERS entry for device trees that I've
> added. It would be nice to have a guideline here.

Hm? That's not a warning anyone should fix. If any of these patches are
because of checkpatch, then obviously this should never be accepted.

And that's true for every other change, every addition of C or H file.
You do not add maintainer entries for them.

> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof