[PATCH v8 21/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load
Steven Price
steven.price at arm.com
Wed May 21 03:21:13 PDT 2025
On 19/05/2025 18:48, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 16/04/2025 14:41, Steven Price wrote:
>> When loading a realm VCPU much of the work is handled by the RMM so only
>> some of the actions are required. Rearrange kvm_arch_vcpu_load()
>> slightly so we can bail out early for a realm guest.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> index cf707130ef66..08d5e0d76749 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> @@ -644,10 +644,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> int cpu)
>
> I think we use the pkvm hook to skip to the nommu goto, to avoid
> the VMID allocation and context flush.
>
>
>> kvm_timer_vcpu_load(vcpu);
>> kvm_vgic_load(vcpu);
>> kvm_vcpu_load_debug(vcpu);
>> - if (has_vhe())
>> - kvm_vcpu_load_vhe(vcpu);
>> - kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(vcpu);
>> - kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu);
>> if (kvm_arm_is_pvtime_enabled(&vcpu->arch))
>> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_RECORD_STEAL, vcpu);
>
> We could also move thise pvtime to the bottom too ?
>
>> @@ -671,6 +667,15 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> int cpu)
>> &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3);
>> }
>> + /* No additional state needs to be loaded on Realmed VMs */
>> + if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (has_vhe())
>> + kvm_vcpu_load_vhe(vcpu);
>> + kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(vcpu);
>> + kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu);
>> +
>
> With the above addressed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
Thanks, the suggestions above seem sensible, I'll make those changes.
Thanks,
Steve
>
>
>> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, vcpu->kvm->arch.supported_cpus))
>> vcpu_set_on_unsupported_cpu(vcpu);
>> }
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list