[PATCH v8 4/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for multiple device types + BCM59054 compatible

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:20:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2025, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Well, you choose 3 - I do think it'd be a lot easier to go with option
> > 2, or with applying the rest to your tree as acks come in.  There seemed
> > to still be a reasonable amount of discussion on the MFD bits (eg,
> > there's some formatting comments still) so I was expecting this series
> > to churn some more and was waiting for a resend.

> Yes, I expected to apply v9 with your Ack.

OK, that's about where I was expecting - at least one more respin before
the MFD bits are stable.

> I can go with 2 in this case.  Applying in dribs-and-drabs as Acks come
> in would be sub-optimal and would likely end up in a mess.

Well, then just going a head and applying them on a branch with a tag
seems easier than delaying then.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20250515/0dded2dc/attachment.sig>