[PATCH v6 0/2] Add `devm_dma_request_chan()` to simplify probe path in atmel-quadspi.c

Mark Brown broonie at kernel.org
Thu May 15 02:22:38 PDT 2025


On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Csókás Bence wrote:
> On 2025. 05. 15. 10:45, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I can't tell what the plan is here, or what the status is for the first
> > patch (since I'm not CCed).  The second patch depends on a new API
> > introduced in the first patch so it can't be merged independently.

> Yes, the situation is a bit convoluted. Obviously 2/2 will be applied after
> 1/2, in a similar vein than the former PM series.

> So what I was trying to say: Vinod should be able to apply 1/2 to his branch
> (dma/next) right now, which can then be merged to spi/for-next. This merged
> branch should be able to then cleanly apply 2/2.

I wouldn't expect to pull the whole DMA tree in, that'll have a huge
amount of extra stuff in it - if I was going to pull something I'd
expect a topic branch.  Wouldn't it be simpler for me to just apply both
patches at this point if there's no conflicts with the DMA tree?  We're
at -rc6 now...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20250515/18fc1145/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list