[PATCH v9 -next 08/12] arm64: dts: bcm2712: Add external clock for RP1 chipset on Rpi5
Andrea della Porta
andrea.porta at suse.com
Mon May 12 09:42:11 PDT 2025
Hi Florian,
On 15:02 Mon 12 May , Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On May 7, 2025 5:01:05 PM GMT+02:00, Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta at suse.com> wrote:
> >Hi Florian, to accept the patches, what would work best for you?
> >
> >1) Send only the relevant updated patches (maybe as an entirely new
> >patchset with
> > only those specific patches)
>
> Only the updated patches work for me. I don't think there is that much coupling between the DT changes and the non-DT changes (other than without DT entries nothing is activated)
It's a little bit more involved than that:
- Patch 7 (misc driver) depends on 6 (RP1 common dts) which in turn
depends on 1 (clock binding header). Should be taken by Greg.
- Patch 9 and 10 (board dts) depends on 6 (RP1 common dts) which again
depends on 1 (clock binding header). Should be taken by Florian.
- Patch 4 (clock driver) depends on 1 (clock binding header) and
should be taken by Stephen.
So patches 6 and 1 are in common between Florian and Greg, while patch 1
is in common between everyone in the pool.
If I uniquely assign the patches in common to one of you, the others
won't be able to compile their own branch because they will be missing
the dependent patch.
If, on the other hand, I duplicate common patches to each of you to
make the kernel compile for veryone, you should remember that there
will be conflicts due to duplicated patches among different trees
down the merge path.
Any advice about how to proceed is appreciated.
Many thanks,
Andrea
>
> Florian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list