[PATCH 14/14] arm64: dts: Add DSPI entries for S32G platforms
James Clark
james.clark at linaro.org
Fri May 9 06:46:22 PDT 2025
On 09/05/2025 1:54 pm, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 09/05/2025 14:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 09/05/2025 13:06, James Clark wrote:
>>> +&spi1 {
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&dspi1_pins>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + spidev0: spidev at 0 {
>>
>>
>> Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
>> examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-
>> devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>
>>
>>> + compatible = "rohm,dh2228fv";
>>
>>
>> Nah, I really doubt. That's not the device you have there. It's
>> possible, though, so can you share schematics?
>
> Actually, not even possible. There is no DH2228FV from ROHM. There is
> BH2228FV though:
> https://www.rohm.com/products/data-converter/d-a-converters/8bit-d-a/
> bh2228fv-product
>
> but as you know, it is unlikely this is the part populated on the board.
>
> For the author:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250213-calamity-
> smuggler-5d606993be32 at spud/T/
>
> Yours,
> -- Matti
Correct, I believe these go straight to a header and aren't connected,
so this device is just an example placeholder for a 'generic' SPI device.
It might be more accurate to remove this, and then anyone using the
board for development would have to fill in themselves whatever device
is attached to it.
Thanks
James
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list