[PATCH 5/8] dt-bindings: memory: Add Tegra264 definitions

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 08/05/2025 10:02, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>
>>
>>> how much more you'd like me to make it based on that. Do you expect me
>>> to add the nvidia, prefix? In that case it would be inconsistent with
>>> all of the 8 other Tegra MC includes that we have in that directory.
>>
>>
>> Same story as for every other case, why this would be different? All of
>> them - amlogic, mediatek, samsung, qcom, every soc - move to new style
>> since some years, why this one should be different?
> 
> Because we've used exactly this naming convention for more than a
> decade. I get that it's nice to have consistency, but do you really want
> me to go and churn all of these files just so we can add a vendor-prefix
> and drop a redundant suffix?
No, I want new files. Look:
1. Some time ago tegra-1.h was added.
2. Someone spotted that there was tegra-1.h, so added now tegra-2.h.
3. Now this is a pattern so of course next person, even if asked to use
vendor prefix, will not, right? Because it would break the pattern. So
we have tegra-3.h
4. tegra.4 - no vendor prefix, because you have already three cases.
5. You see where I am going?

All of above - amlogic, mediatek, samsung, qcom - had decade of such
convention. I asked to changed, they used the same argument as you
("decade") and then changed.

Why this is different case than decade in amlogic, mediatek, samsung and
qcom?


Best regards,
Krzysztof