[PATCH v3 20/25] irqchip/gic-v5: Add GICv5 PPI support
Thomas Gleixner
tglx at linutronix.de
Wed May 7 07:57:07 PDT 2025
On Wed, May 07 2025 at 14:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2025 14:42:42 +0100,
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 07 2025 at 10:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> > On Tue, 06 May 2025 16:00:31 +0100,
>> > Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> How does this test distinguish between LEVEL_LOW and LEVEL_HIGH? It only
>> >> tests for level, no? So the test is interesting at best ...
>> >
>> > There is no distinction between HIGH and LOW, RISING and FALLING, in
>> > any revision of the GIC architecture.
>>
>> Then pretending that there is a set_type() functionality is pretty daft
>
> You still need to distinguish between level and edge when this is
> programmable (which is the case for a subset of the PPIs).
Fair enough, but can we please add a comment to this function which
explains this oddity.
Thanks,
tglx
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list