[PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: arm64: UBSAN at EL2
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Wed May 7 03:35:13 PDT 2025
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:27:07 +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> Many of the sanitizers the kernel supports are disabled when running
> in EL2 with nvhe/hvhe/proctected modes, some of those are easier
> (and makes more sense) to integrate than others.
> Last year, kCFI support was added in [1]
>
> This patchset adds support for UBSAN in EL2.
> UBSAN can run in 2 modes:
> 1) “Normal” (CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=n): In this mode the compiler will
> do the UBSAN checks and insert some function calls in case of
> failures, it can provide more information(ex: what is the value of
> the out of bound) about the failures through those function arguments,
> and those functions(implemented in lib/ubsan.c) will print a report with
> such errors.
>
> [...]
Applied to next, thanks!
[1/4] arm64: Introduce esr_is_ubsan_brk()
commit: dc1fd37a7f501731e488c1c6f86b2f591632a4ad
[2/4] ubsan: Remove regs from report_ubsan_failure()
commit: d683a8561889c1813fe2ad6082769c91e3cb71b3
[3/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce CONFIG_UBSAN_KVM_EL2
commit: 61b38f7591fb434fce326c1d686a9793c7f418bc
[4/4] KVM: arm64: Handle UBSAN faults
commit: 446692759b0732ef2d9a93b7e6730aa762ccf0ab
Cheers,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list