[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for AM62D2 SoC

Nishanth Menon nm at ti.com
Mon May 5 06:03:03 PDT 2025


On 15:01-20250505, Paresh Bhagat wrote:
> On 02/05/25 21:35, Nishanth Menon wrote:
[...]

> > Looking at the board patch in the series, this is am62p5 ? what is the
> > difference? If there is a difference, why is there no dtsi
> > file for am62d?

> AM62d2 SoC is similar to AM62a7 in terms of CPU cores, cache hierarchy and

Looking at the block diagram side to side, I am unable to see any
difference - it looks like "similar" is "same" ?

> other peripherals. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220901141328.899100-5-vigneshr@ti.com/
> Thus same dtsi file is being reused here.

So, if there is no difference at all, why this series? Commit message
does need to specify why exactly what is different and why we are
re-using. If there is no difference what so ever, then we follow what we
have done in K3 architecture so far, which is just to introduce a board
file (assuming there is difference there Vs what is supported already).

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list