[PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: power: reset: google,gs101-reboot: add Google GS101 specific reset

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org
Mon Mar 31 00:11:28 PDT 2025


On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 03:15:19PM +0000, André Draszik wrote:
> GS101 supports a couple different reset types via certain registers in
> the SYSCON register map.
> 
> Add a binding for this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik at linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/power/reset/google,gs101-reboot.yaml  | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  MAINTAINERS                                        |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/google,gs101-reboot.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/google,gs101-reboot.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cbd0a1d9b45af0cb994d616c56b96440c43ab971
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/google,gs101-reboot.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/power/reset/google,gs101-reboot.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Google GS101 syscon-mapped reset
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - André Draszik <andre.draszik at linaro.org>
> +
> +description:
> +  GS101 supports a couple different reset types via certain registers in the
> +  SYSCON register map. This map is retrieved from the parental dt-node. So the
> +  gs101-reboot node should be represented as a sub-node of such a node.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:

Just const instead of these two


> +          - const: google,gs101-reboot
> +
> +  priority:
> +    default: 192
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: restart-handler.yaml#

Missing example... unless you are adding it in the other patch to the
parent node. but then separate schema for just two properties and allOf:
is really too much. Altough let me comment on the other patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list