[PATCH 18/34] mfd: sec: s2dos05: doesn't support interrupts (it seems)

[André Draszik]

The commit bf231e5febcf ("mfd: sec-core: Add support for the Samsung
s2dos05") adding s2dos05 support didn't add anything related to IRQ
support, so I assume this works without IRQs.

Rather than printing a warning message in sec_irq_init() due to the
missing IRQ number, or returning an error due to a missing irq chip
regmap, just return early explicitly.

This will become particularly important once errors from sec_irq_init()
aren't ignored anymore in an upcoming patch and helps the reader of
this code while reasoning about what the intention might be here.

Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik at linaro.org>
---
 drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
index d05c8b66c35f2a1356d7c641484404628870ed42..dc5560a0c496917e847a40295c53e3f762b60998 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
@@ -453,16 +453,12 @@ int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
 	int type = sec_pmic->device_type;
 	const struct regmap_irq_chip *sec_irq_chip;
 
-	if (!sec_pmic->irq) {
-		dev_warn(sec_pmic->dev,
-			 "No interrupt specified, no interrupts\n");
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	switch (type) {
 	case S5M8767X:
 		sec_irq_chip = &s5m8767_irq_chip;
 		break;
+	case S2DOS05:
+		return 0;
 	case S2MPA01:
 		sec_irq_chip = &s2mps14_irq_chip;
 		break;
@@ -493,6 +489,12 @@ int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
 				     sec_pmic->device_type);
 	}
 
+	if (!sec_pmic->irq) {
+		dev_warn(sec_pmic->dev,
+			 "No interrupt specified, no interrupts\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(sec_pmic->dev, sec_pmic->regmap_pmic,
 				       sec_pmic->irq, IRQF_ONESHOT,
 				       0, sec_irq_chip, &sec_pmic->irq_data);

-- 
2.49.0.395.g12beb8f557-goog