[PATCH net-next v3 1/7] net: ethtool: netlink: Allow per-netdevice DUMP operations
Maxime Chevallier
maxime.chevallier at bootlin.com
Fri Mar 21 10:41:34 PDT 2025
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 17:31:17 +0100
Paolo Abeni <pabeni at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 3/13/25 7:26 PM, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > We have a number of netlink commands in the ethnl family that may have
> > multiple objects to dump even for a single net_device, including :
> >
> > - PLCA, PSE-PD, phy: one message per PHY device
> > - tsinfo: one message per timestamp source (netdev + phys)
> > - rss: One per RSS context
> >
> > To get this behaviour, these netlink commands need to roll a custom
> > ->dumpit().
> >
> > To prepare making per-netdev DUMP more generic in ethnl, introduce a
> > member in the ethnl ops to indicate if a given command may allow
> > pernetdev DUMPs (also referred to as filtered DUMPs).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier at bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > net/ethtool/netlink.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > net/ethtool/netlink.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ethtool/netlink.c b/net/ethtool/netlink.c
> > index a163d40c6431..7adede5e4ff1 100644
> > --- a/net/ethtool/netlink.c
> > +++ b/net/ethtool/netlink.c
> > @@ -587,21 +587,38 @@ static int ethnl_default_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
>
> Maintain the RCU read lock here is IMHO confusing...
>
> > - for_each_netdev_dump(net, dev, ctx->pos_ifindex) {
> > - dev_hold(dev);
> > + if (ctx->req_info->dev) {
> > + dev = ctx->req_info->dev;
>
> .. as this is refcounted.
>
> I suggest to move the rcu_read_lock inside the if.
Indeed, maybe not the best place indeed. I'll address that, thanks for
pointing this out
>
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > + /* Filtered DUMP request targeted to a single netdev. We already
> > + * hold a ref to the netdev from ->start()
> > + */
> > + ret = ethnl_default_dump_one(skb, dev, ctx,
> > + genl_info_dump(cb));
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + netdev_put(ctx->req_info->dev, &ctx->req_info->dev_tracker);
> >
> > - ret = ethnl_default_dump_one(skb, dev, ctx, genl_info_dump(cb));
> > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP && likely(skb->len))
> > + ret = skb->len;
> >
> > - rcu_read_lock();
> > - dev_put(dev);
> > + } else {
> > + for_each_netdev_dump(net, dev, ctx->pos_ifindex) {
> > + dev_hold(dev);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + ret = ethnl_default_dump_one(skb, dev, ctx,
> > + genl_info_dump(cb));
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + dev_put(dev);
> >
> > - if (ret < 0 && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> > - if (likely(skb->len))
> > - ret = skb->len;
> > - break;
> > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> > + if (likely(skb->len))
> > + ret = skb->len;
>
> IMHO a bit too many levels of indentation. It's possibly better to move
> this code in a separate helper.
That's true, not the prettiest piece of that patch. I'll refactor this
better then.
Thanks for the review,
Maxime
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list