[PATCH v2 7/7] accel/rocket: Add IOCTLs for synchronizing memory accesses

Jeffrey Hugo quic_jhugo at quicinc.com
Fri Mar 21 09:15:25 PDT 2025


On 2/25/2025 12:55 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> +int rocket_ioctl_fini_bo(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> +{
> +	struct drm_rocket_fini_bo *args = data;
> +	struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj;
> +	struct rocket_gem_object *rkt_obj;
> +	struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem_obj;
> +	struct rocket_device *rdev = to_rocket_device(dev);
> +
> +	gem_obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!gem_obj)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	rkt_obj = to_rocket_bo(gem_obj);
> +	shmem_obj = &rkt_obj->base;
> +
> +	WARN_ON(rkt_obj->last_cpu_prep_op == 0);
> +
> +	for (unsigned int core = 1; core < rdev->num_cores; core++) {
> +		dma_sync_sgtable_for_device(rdev->cores[core].dev, shmem_obj->sgt,
> +					    rocket_op_to_dma_dir(rkt_obj->last_cpu_prep_op));
> +	}
> +
> +	rkt_obj->last_cpu_prep_op = 0;
> +
> +	drm_gem_object_put(gem_obj);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

flags must be 0, and you must check that here. You do not appear to be 
doing that. Otherwise, userspace may put a value in flags, which is 
ignored now, but later when you define flags for a purpose, existing 
userspace will be broken - a uapi violation.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list