[PATCH v2 7/7] accel/rocket: Add IOCTLs for synchronizing memory accesses
Jeffrey Hugo
quic_jhugo at quicinc.com
Fri Mar 21 09:15:25 PDT 2025
On 2/25/2025 12:55 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> +int rocket_ioctl_fini_bo(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> +{
> + struct drm_rocket_fini_bo *args = data;
> + struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj;
> + struct rocket_gem_object *rkt_obj;
> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem_obj;
> + struct rocket_device *rdev = to_rocket_device(dev);
> +
> + gem_obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> + if (!gem_obj)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + rkt_obj = to_rocket_bo(gem_obj);
> + shmem_obj = &rkt_obj->base;
> +
> + WARN_ON(rkt_obj->last_cpu_prep_op == 0);
> +
> + for (unsigned int core = 1; core < rdev->num_cores; core++) {
> + dma_sync_sgtable_for_device(rdev->cores[core].dev, shmem_obj->sgt,
> + rocket_op_to_dma_dir(rkt_obj->last_cpu_prep_op));
> + }
> +
> + rkt_obj->last_cpu_prep_op = 0;
> +
> + drm_gem_object_put(gem_obj);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
flags must be 0, and you must check that here. You do not appear to be
doing that. Otherwise, userspace may put a value in flags, which is
ignored now, but later when you define flags for a purpose, existing
userspace will be broken - a uapi violation.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list