[PATCH v5 1/9] riscv: Safely remove huge_pte_offset() when manipulating NAPOT ptes
Alexandre Ghiti
alexghiti at rivosinc.com
Fri Mar 21 06:06:27 PDT 2025
The pte_t pointer is expected to point to the first entry of the NAPOT
mapping so no need to use huge_pte_offset(), similarly to what is done
in arm64.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti at rivosinc.com>
---
arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
index 375dd96bb4a0..3192ad804279 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
@@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ int huge_ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
order = napot_cont_order(pte);
pte_num = napot_pte_num(order);
- ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, addr, napot_cont_size(order));
orig_pte = get_clear_contig_flush(mm, addr, ptep, pte_num);
if (pte_dirty(orig_pte))
@@ -334,7 +333,6 @@ void huge_ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm,
order = napot_cont_order(pte);
pte_num = napot_pte_num(order);
- ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, addr, napot_cont_size(order));
orig_pte = get_clear_contig_flush(mm, addr, ptep, pte_num);
orig_pte = pte_wrprotect(orig_pte);
--
2.39.2
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list