[v3 PATCH 2/6] arm64: cpufeature: add AmpereOne to BBML2 allow list
Yang Shi
yang at os.amperecomputing.com
Mon Mar 17 10:50:22 PDT 2025
On 3/14/25 3:58 AM, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 04/03/2025 22:19, Yang Shi wrote:
>> AmpereOne supports BBML2 without conflict abort, add to the allow list.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi<yang at os.amperecomputing.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index 7934c6dd493e..bf3df8407ca3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -2192,6 +2192,8 @@ static bool cpu_has_bbml2_noabort(unsigned int cpu_midr)
>> static const struct midr_range supports_bbml2_noabort_list[] = {
>> MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_X4, 0, 3, 0xf),
>> MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_NEOVERSE_V3, 0, 2, 0xf),
>> + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_AMPERE1),
>> + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_AMPERE1A),
>> {}
>> };
>>
> Miko's series will move back to additionally checking MMFR2.BBM, so you will
> need to add an erratum workaround for these CPUs to set MMFR2.BBM=2 in the
> per-cpu "sanitised" feature register. See:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/86ecyzorb7.wl-maz@kernel.org/
Thank you. I will talk to our architect to see how we should handle
this. This should not block the page table split work.
Yang
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list