[PATCH v1 5/6] drm/panfrost: Enable AARCH64_4K page table format on mediatek_mt8188

[Ariel D'Alessandro]

Angelo,

On 3/11/25 6:09 AM, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 10/03/25 20:59, Ariel D'Alessandro ha scritto:
>> Now that Panfrost supports AARCH64_4K page table format, let's enable it
>> on Mediatek MT8188.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro at collabora.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/ 
>> drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
>> index 0f3935556ac76..d7b8bded6d784 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
>> @@ -824,6 +824,7 @@ static const struct panfrost_compatible 
>> mediatek_mt8188_data = {
>>       .num_pm_domains = ARRAY_SIZE(mediatek_mt8183_pm_domains),
>>       .pm_domain_names = mediatek_mt8183_pm_domains,
>>       .pm_features = BIT(GPU_PM_CLK_DIS) | BIT(GPU_PM_VREG_OFF),
>> +    .gpu_configs = BIT(GPU_CONFIG_AARCH64_4K),
>>   };
>>   static const char * const mediatek_mt8192_supplies[] = { "mali", 
>> NULL };
> 
> Didn't that work on MT8195/8395 as well? I also recall hearing that it 
> was somewhat
> giving ever-so-slightly better performance?

Running glmark2-es2-drm [0] benchmark, reported the same performance 
("glmark2 Score") on both configurations, before and after this 
patchset. Tested on a Mediatek Genio 1200 EVK board.

To avoid holding this longer, I'll add it to patchset v2, and let's 
continue discussion there in any case.

[0] https://github.com/glmark2/glmark2

> 
> If it does, please enable it on 8195 as well :-)
> 
> also s/mediatek_mt8188/MediaTek MT8188/g

Ack.

> 
> ...and btw
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
> <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>

Thanks!

-- 
Ariel D'Alessandro
Software Engineer

Collabora Ltd.
Platinum Building, St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS, UK 
Registered in England & Wales, no. 5513718