[PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: freescale: Add basic dtsi for imx943
Jacky Bai
ping.bai at nxp.com
Tue Mar 4 07:16:00 PST 2025
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: freescale: Add basic dtsi for imx943
>
> On 04/03/2025 10:31, Jacky Bai wrote:
> > Add the minimal dtsi support for i.MX943. i.MX943 is the first SoC of
> > i.MX94 Family, create a common dtsi for the whole i.MX94 family, and
> > the specific dtsi part for i.MX943.
> >
> > The clock, power domain and perf index need to be used by the device
> > nodes for resource reference, add them along with the dtsi support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai at nxp.com>
> > ---
> > - v2 changes:
> > - remove the unnecessary macro define in clock header as suggested by
> Krzysztof
> > - split the dtsi into imx94.dtsi and imx943.dtsi
> > - use low case in the pinfunc header as Frank suggested
> > - reorder the device nodes and properties
> > - resolve Krzysztof's other comments
>
> Which ones? Be specific.
>
> Based on last issue, I don't think you implemented comments.
>
>
> > +
> > + a55_irqsteer: interrupt-controller at 446a0000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx-irqsteer";
> > + reg = <0x446a0000 0x1000>;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 224 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 225 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 226 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 227 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 228 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 229 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX94_CLK_BUSAON>;
> > + clock-names = "ipg";
> > + fsl,channel = <0>;
> > + fsl,num-irqs = <960>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + aips4: bus at 49000000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,aips-bus", "simple-bus";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x49000000 0x0 0x800000>;
> > + ranges = <0x49000000 0x0 0x49000000 0x800000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + wdog3: watchdog at 49220000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx93-wdt";
>
> imx93 or imx95, like in other places? And the commit msg says imx943.
>
> I already asked for that.
Yes, I know. I asked for your suggestion in v1 mail thread.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/3c9fe85a-5f86-4df6-92fb-e4ceb033f161@kernel.org/T/#m0a180c57e5d79e368b5eae924afbab8706f95546
BR
Jacky Bai
>
> > + reg = <0x49220000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 90 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX94_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>;
> > + timeout-sec = <40>;
> > + fsl,ext-reset-output;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > + };
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list