[PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: dma: fsl-edma: add interrupts-extended property

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/03/2025 15:40, Jacky Bai wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: dma: fsl-edma: add
>> interrupts-extended property
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 05:31:24PM +0800, Jacky Bai wrote:
>>> Add interrupts-extended property for edma that has multiple interrupt
>>> controllers used.
>>
>> Did you try using interrupts-extended? No. Because either is supported by the
>> tools already.
>>
> 
> We need to use interrupts-extended property for i.MX94 because for the edma's
> interrupts, some are connected to irqsteer interrupt controller and some are connected
> to the GIC. make dtbs_check report error, so I add this dt binding changes.
> 
> Sorry, Which tools are you referring?

Linux, dtschema, everything.

> 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai at nxp.com>
>>> ---
>>>  - v2 changes:
>>>   - newly added entry
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl,edma.yaml | 11
>> ++++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl,edma.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl,edma.yaml
>>> index d54140f18d34..549afb8611a9 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl,edma.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl,edma.yaml
>>> @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ properties:
>>>      minItems: 1
>>>      maxItems: 64
>>>
>>> +  interrupts-extended:
>>> +    minItems: 1
>>> +    maxItems: 65
>>
>> Doesn't match the size for interrupt-names:
>>
> 
> The interrupt-names are only true for vf610, maxItems is
> enough for such case. do we still need to update it? 

They always go in sync.

Anyway, you did not get the point of Rob's comments: this patch is
neither needed nor correct. Just drop it and test again your DTS.



Best regards,
Krzysztof