[PATCH v2] spi: stm32: fix pointer-to-pointer variables usage

[Clement LE GOFFIC]

On 6/30/25 10:12, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> In stm32_spi_prepare_rx_dma_mdma_chaining() both rx_dma_desc
> and rx_mdma_desc are passed as pointer-to-pointer arguments.
> 
> The goal is to pass back to the caller the value returned
> by dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(), when it is not NULL.
> 
> However, these variables are wrongly handled as simple pointers
> during later assignments and checks.
> 
> Fix this behaviour by introducing two pointer variables
> which can then be treated accordingly.
> 
> Fixes: d17dd2f1d8a1 ("spi: stm32: use STM32 DMA with STM32 MDMA to enhance DDR use")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1644715 ("Null pointer dereferences (REVERSE_INULL)")
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio at mandelbit.com>
> 
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> * introduce *_mdma_desc and *_dma_desc for better readability
> * fix another instance of rx_dma_desc bogus assignment in case of
>    failure of sg_alloc_table()
> * commit title/message reworded accordingly to the previous point
> ---
>   drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c b/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c
> index 3d20f09f1ae7..4b7f074fdba9 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c
> @@ -1474,6 +1474,8 @@ static int stm32_spi_prepare_rx_dma_mdma_chaining(struct stm32_spi *spi,
>   						  struct dma_async_tx_descriptor **rx_dma_desc,
>   						  struct dma_async_tx_descriptor **rx_mdma_desc)
>   {
> +	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *_mdma_desc = *rx_mdma_desc;
> +	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *_dma_desc = *rx_dma_desc;
>   	struct dma_slave_config rx_mdma_conf = {0};
>   	u32 sram_period, nents = 0, spi_s_len;
>   	struct sg_table dma_sgt, mdma_sgt;
> @@ -1524,18 +1526,18 @@ static int stm32_spi_prepare_rx_dma_mdma_chaining(struct stm32_spi *spi,
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	*rx_dma_desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(spi->dma_rx, dma_sgt.sgl,
> -					       dma_sgt.nents, rx_dma_conf->direction,
> -					       DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT);
> +	_dma_desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(spi->dma_rx, dma_sgt.sgl,
> +					    dma_sgt.nents, rx_dma_conf->direction,
> +					    DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT);
>   	sg_free_table(&dma_sgt);
>   
> -	if (!rx_dma_desc)
> +	if (!_dma_desc)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
>   	/* Prepare MDMA slave_sg transfer MEM_TO_MEM (SRAM>DDR) */
>   	ret = sg_alloc_table(&mdma_sgt, nents, GFP_ATOMIC);
>   	if (ret) {
> -		rx_dma_desc = NULL;
> +		_dma_desc = NULL;
>   		return ret;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -1558,13 +1560,13 @@ static int stm32_spi_prepare_rx_dma_mdma_chaining(struct stm32_spi *spi,
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	*rx_mdma_desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(spi->mdma_rx, mdma_sgt.sgl,
> -						mdma_sgt.nents, rx_mdma_conf.direction,
> -						DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT);
> +	_mdma_desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(spi->mdma_rx, mdma_sgt.sgl,
> +					     mdma_sgt.nents, rx_mdma_conf.direction,
> +					     DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT);
>   	sg_free_table(&mdma_sgt);
>   
> -	if (!rx_mdma_desc) {
> -		rx_dma_desc = NULL;
> +	if (!_mdma_desc) {
> +		_dma_desc = NULL;
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   

Thank you, LGTM
You can add my Reviewed-by

Best regards,
Clément