[PATCH 5.4 000/222] 5.4.295-rc1 review
Naresh Kamboju
naresh.kamboju at linaro.org
Tue Jun 24 21:33:22 PDT 2025
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 15:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:46:15AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 18:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.295 release.
> > > There are 222 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:05:50 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.295-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Regressions on arm defconfig builds with gcc-12 and clang failed on
> > the Linux stable-rc 5.4.295-rc1.
> >
> > Regressions found on arm
> > * arm, build
> > - clang-20-axm55xx_defconfig
> > - clang-20-defconfig
> > - clang-20-lkftconfig
> > - clang-20-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
> > - clang-nightly-axm55xx_defconfig
> > - clang-nightly-defconfig
> > - clang-nightly-lkftconfig
> > - gcc-12-axm55xx_defconfig
> > - gcc-12-defconfig
> > - gcc-12-lkftconfig
> > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-debug
> > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-kasan
> > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-kunit
> > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-libgpiod
> > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
> > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-perf
> > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-rcutorture
> > - gcc-8-axm55xx_defconfig
> > - gcc-8-defconfig
> >
> > Regression Analysis:
> > - New regression? Yes
> > - Reproducibility? Yes
> >
> > Build regression: stable-rc 5.4.295-rc1 arm kvm init.S Error selected
> > processor does not support `eret' in ARM mode
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft at linaro.org>
> >
> >
> > ## Build errors
> > arch/arm/kvm/init.S: Assembler messages:
> > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:109: Error: selected processor does not support
> > `eret' in ARM mode
> > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:116: Error: Banked registers are not available
> > with this architecture. -- `msr ELR_hyp,r1'
> > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:145: Error: selected processor does not support
> > `eret' in ARM mode
> > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:149: Error: selected processor does not support
> > `eret' in ARM mode
> > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:345: arch/arm/kvm/init.o] Error 1
> >
> > and
> > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s: Assembler messages:
> > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:45: Error: selected processor does not support `smc
> > #0' in ARM mode
> > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:94: Error: selected processor does not support `smc
> > #0' in ARM mode
> > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:160: Error: selected processor does not support `smc
> > #0' in ARM mode
> > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:296: Error: selected processor does not support `smc
> > #0' in ARM mode
> > make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:262:
> > drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-32.o] Error 1
>
> That's odd, both clang and gcc don't like this? Any chance you can do
> 'git bisect' to track down the offending commit?
The git bisection pointing to,
kbuild: Update assembler calls to use proper flags and language target
commit d5c8d6e0fa61401a729e9eb6a9c7077b2d3aebb0 upstream.
- Naresh
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list